In the news article “The Art of Distraction,” writer Hanif Kureishi asserts that medicating many conditions such as ADD and Dyslexia and treating them as diseases may stifle a child’s creativity. First, he asks what qualifies as a condition, as his inability to neither speak Russian nor dance the tango are not medicated or treated as a failure of development. Second, sometimes distractions are a good thing, because it is good to pause and let good, creative ideas come to the mind. Third, Kureishi suggests that perhaps the child’s creativity is being suppressed by such drugs as Ritalin only to benefit the parents, because they see that there is a problem where a child may see an opportunity to break free from their regular routine and try something else that stimulates them and will most likely benefit them in the future.
Kureishi, Hanif. "The Art of Distraction." New York Times. 18 Feb. 2012. Web. 24
Feb. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/opinion/sunday/the-art-of-
distraction.html>.
I loved that this article was written by a writer who struggles with learning disorders. No facts or numbers, but pure, raw emotion. This shows that there are many people who don't want to be medicated, and feel stifled by it. Kureishi found the beauty-- the gift-- in his curse. He poses the question: Are these really conditions? Or are they wings that allow children to fly? He found that, although he had a rough childhood coping with such "disorders," he feels as though they have helped him in the long run. This testimony shows that medication is not necessarily necessary, and in fact may even be harmful.